Send OTP Emails in Go (2026) with a Plain HTTP API
Build signup/login OTP in Go: crypto/rand, HMAC-hashed codes in sync.Map/Redis/SQL, rate limits, net/http or chi to POST /emails, and Idempotency-Key—prefer HTTP over SMTP; Rovela delivers only.
Why Go + OTP codes (not a magic-link SDK)
Go already gives signup and login a boring, reliable shape: net/http (or chi) handlers, middleware for rate limits, and a server-side store (sync.Map, Redis, or SQL). You do not need a Rovela Go SDK, an “OTP product” endpoint, or a middleware that pretends the email API is an identity provider.
What you need is the recipe in Email verification codes: your app mints a six-digit code with crypto/rand, stores an HMAC of it (never the digits), sets expiry and attempt limits, then POST /emails with both html and text via the standard library net/http client. Rovela queues, DKIM-signs, retries, and records events. It does not generate codes, check them, or create sessions.
Rovela does not provide an OTP feature. Your Go service owns cryptography, the store entry, resend throttling, redeem logic, and the session cookie / JWT. Rovela only delivers the mail.
This article is Go focused (1.22+ friendly handlers, works the same on chi / Echo / Gin): handlers for “send code” and “verify code,” a thin Rovela client, an in-memory or Redis HMAC store, and an Idempotency-Key so a timeout retry does not enqueue two disagreeing codes. It is not a magic-link walkthrough—for those see Next.js, NestJS, Rails, and FastAPI. Sibling OTP posts: Express.js, Django, Laravel. Product choice between digits and URLs: Email verification: code vs link. Language-agnostic OTP: Sending OTP codes by email. Generic Go transport (not OTP): Sending email in Go—this post does not rehash SMTP dialers, MIME builders, or one-off “hello world” sends.
What you own vs what Rovela sends
Your Go service owns:
crypto/rand→ six digits, zero-padded (nevermath/rand)- HMAC-SHA256 of
email + ":" + codewith a server pepper (CODE_PEPPER) viacrypto/hmac+crypto/sha256 - Expiry (docs example: ~10 minutes), attempt counter, and “one send per minute” resend gate
- Upsert by normalized email so a new send invalidates the previous code (
sync.Map, Redis, or SQL) - Constant-time compare on redeem (
hmac.Equal); delete / invalidate on success - Identical public responses whether or not you want to reveal account existence (product choice)
- Rate limits on
/auth/otp/sendand/auth/otp/verify
Rovela owns:
POST https://api.rovela.dev/emailswithAuthorization: Bearer+ asending_accesskey (ROVELA_API_KEYin env—never commit it, never put it in a public config, never log it)- Queueing, signing, retries, bounce/complaint handling
A 200 from the send endpoint means accepted and queued, not “in the inbox.”
Env and a tiny Rovela client (net/http)
// config.go
package otp
import (
"os"
"strconv"
"time"
)
type Config struct {
APIKey string
CodePepper []byte
From string
TTL time.Duration
ResendCooldown time.Duration
MaxAttempts int
}
func LoadConfig() Config {
ttlMin, _ := strconv.Atoi(envOr("OTP_TTL_MINUTES", "10"))
coolSec, _ := strconv.Atoi(envOr("OTP_RESEND_COOLDOWN_SEC", "60"))
maxAtt, _ := strconv.Atoi(envOr("OTP_MAX_ATTEMPTS", "5"))
return Config{
APIKey: mustEnv("ROVELA_API_KEY"), // sending_access
CodePepper: []byte(mustEnv("CODE_PEPPER")),
From: envOr("OTP_FROM", "Acme <security@mail.acme.com>"),
TTL: time.Duration(ttlMin) * time.Minute,
ResendCooldown: time.Duration(coolSec) * time.Second,
MaxAttempts: maxAtt,
}
}
func mustEnv(k string) string {
v := os.Getenv(k)
if v == "" {
panic("missing env " + k)
}
return v
}
func envOr(k, def string) string {
if v := os.Getenv(k); v != "" {
return v
}
return def
}
// rovela.go
package otp
import (
"bytes"
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"io"
"net/http"
"time"
)
type MailClient struct {
HTTP *http.Client
APIKey string
From string
}
type SendInput struct {
To string
Subject string
HTML string
Text string
IdempotencyKey string
}
func (c *MailClient) Send(ctx context.Context, in SendInput) (map[string]any, error) {
body, _ := json.Marshal(map[string]string{
"from": c.From,
"to": in.To,
"subject": in.Subject,
"html": in.HTML,
"text": in.Text,
})
req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, "https://api.rovela.dev/emails", bytes.NewReader(body))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
req.Header.Set("Authorization", "Bearer "+c.APIKey)
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
req.Header.Set("Idempotency-Key", in.IdempotencyKey)
req.Header.Set("Accept", "application/json")
client := c.HTTP
if client == nil {
client = &http.Client{Timeout: 15 * time.Second}
}
res, err := client.Do(req)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer res.Body.Close()
raw, _ := io.ReadAll(res.Body)
if res.StatusCode >= 300 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("rovela send failed: %d %s", res.StatusCode, string(raw))
}
var out map[string]any
if err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &out); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return out, nil
}
Wire ROVELA_API_KEY and CODE_PEPPER like any other server secret (Authentication, Quick Start). A sending_access key is enough—and preferred—for production OTP senders.
Hash at rest: crypto/rand + HMAC, not bare SHA-256
Six digits are only a million possibilities. A leaked table of bare SHA-256 hashes is reversed in well under a second. Follow the docs: HMAC with a pepper that never leaves the server.
// crypto.go
package otp
import (
"crypto/hmac"
"crypto/rand"
"crypto/sha256"
"encoding/hex"
"fmt"
"math/big"
"strings"
)
func NormalizeEmail(raw string) string {
return strings.ToLower(strings.TrimSpace(raw))
}
func MintCode() (string, error) {
// CSPRNG — math/rand is not for secrets
n, err := rand.Int(rand.Reader, big.NewInt(1_000_000))
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return fmt.Sprintf("%06d", n.Int64()), nil
}
func HashCode(pepper []byte, email, code string) string {
mac := hmac.New(sha256.New, pepper)
mac.Write([]byte(email + ":" + code))
return hex.EncodeToString(mac.Sum(nil))
}
func SafeEqualHex(a, b string) bool {
ab, err1 := hex.DecodeString(a)
bb, err2 := hex.DecodeString(b)
if err1 != nil || err2 != nil || len(ab) != len(bb) {
return false
}
return hmac.Equal(ab, bb)
}
Suggested row shape (one active code per email), matching the verification-code example:
CREATE TABLE verification_codes (
email TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
code_hash TEXT NOT NULL,
expires_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
attempts INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
sent_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
In-memory sketch for demos: a sync.Map keyed by email works for a single process. Use Redis or Postgres when you run multiple replicas.
Service: send + verify (sync.Map store)
// service.go
package otp
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"strings"
"sync"
"time"
)
type record struct {
CodeHash string
Attempts int
ExpiresAt time.Time
SentAt time.Time
}
type Service struct {
Cfg Config
Mail *MailClient
store sync.Map // email -> record
}
const safeSendMsg = "If that address can receive mail, a code is on its way."
func (s *Service) Send(ctx context.Context, rawEmail string) (map[string]any, error) {
email := NormalizeEmail(rawEmail)
now := time.Now().UTC()
if v, ok := s.store.Load(email); ok {
rec := v.(record)
if now.Sub(rec.SentAt) < s.Cfg.ResendCooldown {
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "too_soon"}, nil
}
}
code, err := MintCode()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
codeHash := HashCode(s.Cfg.CodePepper, email, code)
s.store.Store(email, record{
CodeHash: codeHash,
Attempts: 0,
ExpiresAt: now.Add(s.Cfg.TTL),
SentAt: now,
})
// Stable per logical send: hash prefix. New code ⇒ new key.
idem := "otp-" + codeHash[:32]
ttlMin := int(s.Cfg.TTL.Minutes())
_, err = s.Mail.Send(ctx, SendInput{
To: email,
Subject: "Your Acme code: " + code,
HTML: "<p>Your verification code is</p>" +
`<p style="font-size:28px;font-weight:600;letter-spacing:4px">` + code + `</p>` +
fmt.Sprintf("<p>It expires in %d minutes. If you did not ask for it, ignore this email.</p>", ttlMin),
Text: fmt.Sprintf(
"Your verification code is %s. It expires in %d minutes. If you did not ask for it, ignore this email.",
code, ttlMin,
),
IdempotencyKey: idem,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return map[string]any{"ok": true, "message": safeSendMsg}, nil
}
func (s *Service) Verify(rawEmail, rawCode string) map[string]any {
email := NormalizeEmail(rawEmail)
code := strings.TrimSpace(rawCode)
if len(code) != 6 || !allDigits(code) {
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "invalid"}
}
v, ok := s.store.Load(email)
if !ok {
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "invalid"}
}
rec := v.(record)
now := time.Now().UTC()
if now.After(rec.ExpiresAt) {
s.store.Delete(email)
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "expired"}
}
if rec.Attempts >= s.Cfg.MaxAttempts {
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "locked"}
}
if !SafeEqualHex(HashCode(s.Cfg.CodePepper, email, code), rec.CodeHash) {
rec.Attempts++
s.store.Store(email, rec)
return map[string]any{"ok": false, "error": "invalid"}
}
s.store.Delete(email)
// issue session / JWT here
return map[string]any{"ok": true}
}
func allDigits(s string) bool {
for _, r := range s {
if r < '0' || r > '9' {
return false
}
}
return true
}
Putting the code in the subject helps lock-screen previews—fine for many products; skip it on highly shared screens (verification-code docs). Always send both html and text with the digits in the text part (POST /emails).
For Redis: SET otp:{email} {json} with TTL = expiry, plus SET otp:cooldown:{email} 1 EX 60. For SQL: INSERT … ON CONFLICT (email) DO UPDATE, bump attempts inside a transaction, DELETE on success.
Handlers: net/http or chi + rate limits
// handlers.go
package otp
import (
"encoding/json"
"net/http"
)
type Handlers struct {
Svc *Service
}
func (h *Handlers) Send(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var body struct {
Email string `json:"email"`
}
if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&body); err != nil || body.Email == "" {
http.Error(w, `{"error":"invalid_email"}`, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
out, err := h.Svc.Send(r.Context(), body.Email)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, `{"error":"send_failed"}`, http.StatusBadGateway)
return
}
if ok, _ := out["ok"].(bool); !ok {
if out["error"] == "too_soon" {
http.Error(w, `{"error":"too_soon"}`, http.StatusTooManyRequests)
return
}
}
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
_ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]any{"message": out["message"]})
}
func (h *Handlers) Verify(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var body struct {
Email string `json:"email"`
Code string `json:"code"`
}
if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&body); err != nil {
http.Error(w, `{"error":"invalid_json"}`, http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
out := h.Svc.Verify(body.Email, body.Code)
if ok, _ := out["ok"].(bool); !ok {
status := http.StatusBadRequest
if out["error"] == "locked" || out["error"] == "too_soon" {
status = http.StatusTooManyRequests
}
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
w.WriteHeader(status)
_ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]any{"error": out["error"]})
return
}
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
_ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(map[string]any{"ok": true})
}
// main.go (net/http stdlib)
package main
import (
"log"
"net/http"
"example.com/app/otp"
)
func main() {
cfg := otp.LoadConfig()
svc := &otp.Service{
Cfg: cfg,
Mail: &otp.MailClient{APIKey: cfg.APIKey, From: cfg.From},
}
h := &otp.Handlers{Svc: svc}
mux := http.NewServeMux()
mux.Handle("POST /auth/otp/send", withIPLimit(http.HandlerFunc(h.Send), 10))
mux.Handle("POST /auth/otp/verify", withIPLimit(http.HandlerFunc(h.Verify), 20))
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", mux))
}
// chi mount (optional)
// r := chi.NewRouter()
// r.Use(middleware.RealIP, middleware.Recoverer)
// r.With(ipLimit(10)).Post("/auth/otp/send", h.Send)
// r.With(ipLimit(20)).Post("/auth/otp/verify", h.Verify)
Implement withIPLimit / ipLimit with a token bucket per IP (or put Cloudflare / nginx in front). Per-email cooldown inside the service and per-IP limits solve different problems—use both. Hardening checklist: Email OTP security.
Idempotency-Key: retries without double codes
Workers, reverse proxies, and AI agents retry. Without Idempotency-Key, a timeout can deliver two codes that disagree in the user’s inbox.
- Header ≤ 256 characters; Rovela remembers it for 24 hours and returns the original response on replay (API: emails).
- Derive the key from the code hash (
otp-+ first 32 hex chars) so one logical mint maps to one queued message. - A deliberate resend after cooldown mints a new code → new hash → new key. Do not reuse the old key for a new code.
curl -X POST https://api.rovela.dev/emails \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ROVELA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: otp-smoke-go-2026-11-05" \
-d '{
"from": "Acme <security@mail.acme.com>",
"to": "you@example.com",
"subject": "Your Acme code: 482913",
"html": "<p>Your verification code is <b>482913</b>. Expires in 10 minutes.</p>",
"text": "Your verification code is 482913. Expires in 10 minutes."
}'
Why not SMTP dialers for OTP in Go
net/http → POST /emails (this post) | net/smtp / MIME libraries | |
|---|---|---|
| Transport | HTTPS 443 | 465 / 587 (25 often blocked) |
| Idempotency | Idempotency-Key header | App must dedupe |
| Feedback | Message id + webhooks | Bounce DSNs later |
| Containers / Cloud Run | Port 443 always open | SMTP often restricted |
| OTP fit | JSON html + text | Hand-built MIME |
Use SMTP when you already depend on it. For new signup/login digits, call the HTTP API. Broader Go transport patterns live in Sending email in Go.
Deliverability notes for auth digits (not magic URLs)
OTP mail is short and sensitive. Prefer a verified subdomain such as security@mail.example.com, aligned SPF/DKIM/DMARC, and low HTML chrome. Codes in the body (and often the subject) do not need clickable links—so click-tracking rewrites matter less than for magic links—but open/click tracking settings still belong on a domain you control.
If codes land in spam, use the checklist in Why OTP and magic-link emails go to spam. For whether your product should use digits at all versus a confirmation URL, see code vs link.
OTP codes vs magic links in Go
| Six-digit OTP (this post) | Magic link | |
|---|---|---|
| User action | Type digits | Click URL |
| Secret entropy | Low → HMAC + pepper required | High URL token → SHA-256 of token is usually enough |
| Docs shape | Verification codes | Password reset / link pattern |
| Go surface | POST /auth/otp/send + POST /auth/otp/verify | POST /auth/magic/request + GET /auth/magic?token= |
| Click tracking | Optional concern | Prefer off on the security sending domain |
Both call the same POST /emails. Keep separate stores—do not reuse an OTP record as a magic-link token.
Checklist before you ship
crypto/rand+ HMAC pepper; never store raw codes; never usemath/randfor OTP.- ~10 minute TTL, attempt cap, per-email resend cooldown, per-IP rate limit.
- Upsert / overwrite invalidates the previous code; verify deletes on success.
htmlandtext; optional subject code for previews.ROVELA_API_KEY(sending_access) only on the server.Idempotency-Keystable per logical send; new code → new key.- Uniform messaging if you hide account existence.
- Prefer HTTP API over SMTP for OTP; verified from-domain; spam checklist if inbox placement slips.
Related reading
- Docs: Email verification codes · POST /emails · Quick Start · Authentication.
- Product-agnostic OTP: Sending OTP codes by email · Email OTP security.
- UX choice: Email verification: code vs link.
- Deliverability: Why OTP and magic-link emails go to spam.
- Framework siblings: Express OTP · Django OTP · Laravel OTP · magic-link Next.js / NestJS / Rails / FastAPI.
- Go transport only: Sending email in Go.
Bottom line: put signup/login OTP in Go handlers that mint crypto/rand codes, HMAC them at rest (sync.Map, Redis, or SQL), rate-limit send/verify, and call one net/http POST to Rovela with an Idempotency-Key—prefer that over SMTP dialers, and never pretend the email API is your auth server.